Sunday 11 May 2014

The Proposal of Coal Power Usage in Jamaica: A serious Health and Environment Threat

In recent years, the recognition of the links between human rights and the environment has greatly increased. Many States now incorporate a right to a healthy environment in their constitutions. Countries such as Jamaica- regardless of its economic vulnerability - still have substantive obligations to adopt legal and institutional frameworks that protect against environmental harm that interferes with the enjoyment of human rights. This including harm that could be caused by private sector actors and their lobbyists seeking to exploit the country's economic vulnerability.

The publication of a headline in the daily Gleaner   entitled “Coal power to the rescue” on Sunday the 11th of May is cause for a great consternation. The article quoted the ex- director general of the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR), Winston Hay, as lobbying the Jamaican Government to use its public service agencies to educate the public on the usefulness of coal generated power. Winston Hay wants a public service agencies lead initiative to spearhead a public-education campaign aimed at “demystifying the arguments around the use of coal as an environmentally acceptable source of energy”. What an audacious and gravity defying attempt at bamboozling an unsuspecting Jamaican public. 

Such a dishonest suggestion by the former head of the National Planning Agency if remains unchallenged- will cause the the late John Maxwell journalist and environment activist to have a violent epileptic fit of anger from his grave. So if only for the dignity of the late John Maxwell let us examine the facts from reputable experts on the subject.

Access to electricity has a positive effect on the health and well-being of people world-wide. However, the use of coal to generate energy has negative health consequences. There is growing body evidence collated by well respected scientist of coal's negative impact on human health during every stage of its use for electricity generation -- from mining to post-combustion disposal. In particular, the burning of coal has been well-studied, with compelling evidence of the pervasive health effects on the population. Air pollution produced by coal combustion in power plants can affect the respiratory and cardiovascular systems as well as cause abnormal neurological development in children, reduced growth of the foetus before birth, and can cause cancer. Coal used for generating electricity, creates pollutants in outdoor air that are known to cause respiratory ailments and cancer. Additionally, coal combustion contributes to climate change, which in turn can harm human health on a global scale.

According to the Health Care Research Collaborative: people, who live In the vicinity of coal fired power plants, have a massive exposure to emissions. This depends on factors such as weather (temperature, precipitation, wind-direction and speed) and topographical features of the local area.  Coal emissions by their account can also be transported long distances, even globally, causing health effects to those living far from power plants. Individual susceptibility to the health effects of coal emissions depends on age, underlying medical conditions, and use of medications. Populations that are especially vulnerable to health effects from air pollution include children, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with lung conditions like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

A 2007 article published in the medical journal, The Lancet, summarizes the burden of the health effects of generating electricity from coal and lignite (a type of coal). The authors estimate that for every TWH(Terawatt-hour) of electricity produced from coal in Europe, there are 24.5 deaths, 225 serious illnesses including hospital admission, congestive heart failure and chronic bronchitis, and 13,288 minor illnesses.(7) When lignite, the softest and most polluting form of coal, is used, each TWH of electricity produced results in 32.6 deaths, 298 serious illnesses, and 17,676 minor illnesses.In addition Coal combustion in China’s power plants causes an estimated 250,000 deaths per year.

 A study by Gohlke J, Thoma R, Woodward A, Campbell-Lendrum D, Pruss-Ustun A, Hales S, etal. Estimating the global public health implications of electricity and coal modelling the effect of coal use for power generation on life expectancy found that the use of coal predicted a decrease in life expectancy in countries with moderate life expectancy at the baseline year (1965) including Poland, China, Mexico, and Thailand. In India and China, years of life lost were estimated up to 2.5 years and 3.5 years, respectively.

A case study of air pollution effects on the health of 480 primary school children in Cubatao, Brazil, where large quantities of mixed pollutants were emitted from 23 industries (steel mill, chemical industries, cement factory, fertilizer plants, etc.), showed that 55.3% of the children had decreases in pulmonary function. Another example of health effects of air pollution appeared in the Ulsan/Onsan special industrial zone, Republic of Korea, where many large-scale plants (mainly petrochemical plants and metal refineries) are concentrated. Local residents complained of a variety of health problems, particularly of the nervous system disorder called “Onsan Disease”.

The Right to Economic development in Jamaica should not come at the expense of our physical health nor as a burden to the environment. I can understand the urgency to meet the IMF and World Bank growth forecast but it should not come with increased hospital bed spaces, increased graves spaces in cemeteries and large bulge at the pockets of inept “lickey lickey “lobbyists. Let’s find other ways of growing the economy without increasing the mortality rate.

Donovan Reynolds is a Blogger and Independent Writer. He is a British based Social Worker and Human Rights Activist. He has an interest in Politics, Culture, Human Rights and International Development issues. Readers of this blog may add their comments or critique at the space provided on this blog .Or alternatively they may e-mail him at dannygerm63@hotmail.co.uk/ or dannygerm@twitter


Friday 2 May 2014

Viewing Jamaica’s Economic and Social Development Needs from the Current International Development Framework.

The recent discussions around the proposed portal hub development in Jamaica have ignited a flicker of economic hope for the future. The right to development in emerging economies is often saddled with environmental and human rights concerns inter ilea.
The poor track record of successive governments in Jamaica over the past fifty years in areas such as: shaping a progressive economic policy, advancing human rights and strengthening accountability has been an uphill struggle. A culture of change in the right direction for the future is hardly guaranteed. As we anticipate one of the largest post independence Foreign Direct Investment already there are musings of an unavoidable environmental trade off. This concerns the proposed usage of a coal generated power plant.

It is fair to posit that economic and social justice has to be concurrent with civil and political rights- if Jamaica is gain recognition parity with other emerging economies that compete for recognition and foreign direct investment in the global marketplace.
One of the main reasons why we are stuck in an economic black hole for fifty years: Is as a result of short sightedness on the part of the two major duopolies parading as political parties failure to unite around core developmental goals .The other is the failure of citizens to demand political reforms that will hold themselves, public officials and government to a greater levels of accountability.

Every time I visit Jamaica it pains me that most of the people are stuck with a historic notion of politics as a function of their destinies rooted vision of either Norman Manley or Sir Alexander Bustamante development model.  It is not the intention this discourse to devalue the contributions of both stalwart historical figures of the pass. Neither is my attention to ferment a discontent over historically held romantic feelings towards out national heroes.  The sober understanding is that much has changed on a global scale in terms of Economics, Law, international trade and transnational communication. So to hang on to these past political icons is a great disservice to their memory.

Over the past 50 years our long term development goals as a country has been strangulated by a five year preoccupation of keeping the two political classes in power at or absolute peril. This discussion would be tantamount to a pretentious tirade if I omit to flag up a social constructivist approach by locating our development bug bearers that we need to overcome.
The first is to identify that currently our Economic future is tied up with the ability to measure our development against meeting the policy standard of economic organisations such as the WTO the ILO the World Bank, the IMF benchmarks and other international credit rating agencies.

The second consideration is to recognise that there is an increasing push towards world constitutionalism with a growing and relevant transnational and regional legal frame work of treaties and soft laws that we need to keep abreast with. These laws and treaties most of which we are signature to has changed our autonomy as sovereign states and will force changes in the way that we think culturally. The essence of our democracy is no longer rooted in a Hegelian framework that is organic or frozen metaphor of our political heroes of the past. It is based on international legal norms and external treaties that we are a party to.

The third consternation is that we live in an era where Human Rights have trumped cultural relativity. As the world push towards a global culture backed by Human Rights laws- that are part of the push towards a new global constitutional arrangement it has affected our way of life has impacted our domestic law and cultural norms.
So the next vacation that I spend in Jamaica spare me from the sabre rattling tosh about following Bustmate long after he is dead. Neither do I want to hear about the vision and intellect of Norman Washington Manley. Let’s talk about our current political and economic reality and how we can get the current set of desk thumping parliamentarian’s to buy into it.


Donovan Reynolds is a Blogger and Independent Writer. He is a British based Social Worker and Human Rights Activist. He has an interest in Politics, Culture, Human Rights and International Development issues. Readers of this blog may add their comments or critique at the space provided on this blog .Or alternatively they may e-mail him at dannygerm63@hotmail.co.uk/ or dannygerm@twitter